Deblock
Deblock tested whether optimizing for conversion value could improve return on ad spend and acquisition efficiency. The A/B test compared Value Optimization with Target ROAS against Target CPA, with both campaigns using Unified Attribution.
Deblock
Deblock tested whether optimizing for conversion value could improve return on ad spend and acquisition efficiency. The A/B test compared Value Optimization with Target ROAS against Target CPA, with both campaigns using Unified Attribution.
- Nicolas Deutsch - Performance Marketing Manager, Deblock
Deblock, a financial-services app in France, had already seen strong results with Unified Attribution on Snapchat. The team wanted to take the next step: optimize not only for conversions, but for the value those conversions generated.
Deblock tested Value Optimization with Target ROAS bidding. Value Optimization focuses on conversion value, while Target ROAS sets a return-on-ad-spend goal for bidding.
From August 19 to September 21, 2026, Deblock ran an A/B split test under comparable delivery conditions. The team compared a standard Unified campaign using Target CPA (tCPA) with a Unified Value Optimization campaign using Target ROAS (tROAS).
Both campaigns used Unified Attribution. Deblock evaluated D30 ROAS alongside activated-user volume and cost per activated user. For this test, D30 cohort ROAS is based on cumulative revenue observed to date within a 30-day post-install window.
According to Deblock’s own data, used as the source of truth for business performance, the Value Optimization campaign delivered a 2x higher D30 cohort ROAS, based on cumulative revenue observed to date within a 30-day post-install window. 1
Value Optimization also drove 45% more activated users while reducing CPA per activated user by 42%. 1
More Ways To Win With Snapchat